PubMed
Application of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) in most common subtypes of Basal Cell Carcinoma and correlation with histopathology.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405259
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) accounts for 80% of non-melanoma skin cancer. The identification of the histological subtype is crucial for the correct management of the tumor. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel technique that has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in the in vivo diagnosis of BCC. In an effort to determine reliable criteria for preoperative diagnosis of BCC subtypes, Longo et al. and Peppelman et al., described RCM criteria present in different BCC subtypes.
#josepmalvehy #susanapuig #tonibennassar #melanoma #confocalinvivo #confocal #confocalmicroscopy #microscopiaconfocal #carcinoma #bcc #carcinomas #squamouscellcarcinomas #carcinomabasocelular #DiagnosisDermatologica #topdoctors #dermatologiabarcelona #aad18
jueves, 15 de febrero de 2018
Application of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) in most common subtypes of Basal Cell Carcinoma and correlation with histopathology
Ultrasound-based follow-up does not increase survival in early-stage melanoma patients: A comparative cohort study
PubMed
Ultrasound-based follow-up does not increase survival in early-stage melanoma patients: A comparative cohort study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28888850
Different protocols have been used to follow up melanoma patients in stage I-II. However, there is no consensus on the complementary tests that should be requested or the appropriate intervals between visits. Our aim is to compare an ultrasound-based follow-up with a clinical follow-up.
Analysis of two prospectively collected cohorts of melanoma patients in stage IB-IIA from two tertiary referral centres in Barcelona (clinical-based follow-up [C-FU]) and Turin (ultrasound-based follow-up [US-FU]). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), disease-free interval (DFI), nodal metastases-free survival (NMFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS).
A total of 1149 patients in the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IB and IIA were included in this study, of which 554 subjects (48%) were enrolled for a C-FU, and 595 patients (52%) received a protocolised US-FU. The median age was 53.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 41.5-65.2) with a median follow-up time of 4.14 years (IQR 1.2-7.6). During follow-up, 69 patients (12.5%) in C-FU and 72 patients (12.1%) in US-FU developed disease progression. Median time to relapse for the first metastatic site was 2.11 years (IQR 1.14-4.04) for skin metastases, 1.32 (IQR 0.57-3.29) for lymph node metastases and 2.84 (IQR 1.32-4.60) for distant metastases. The pattern of progression and the total proportion of metastases were not significantly different (P = .44) in the two centres. No difference in DFI, DMFS, NMFS and MSS was found between the two cohorts.
Ultrasound-based follow-up does not increase the survival of melanoma patients in stage IB-IIA.
#melanoma #josepmalvehy #malvehy #americanjointcommitteeoncancer #metastases, #susanapuig #aliciabarreiro #cristinacarrera #skincancer #dermatologiabarcelona #dermatologobarcelona #centrodermatologico #dermatologicalcenter #topdoctors #aad18
Ultrasound-based follow-up does not increase survival in early-stage melanoma patients: A comparative cohort study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28888850
INTRODUCTION:
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSION:
martes, 13 de febrero de 2018
A proposed scoring system for assessing the severity of actinic keratosis on the head: actinic keratosis area and severity index
PubMed
A proposed scoring system for assessing the severity of actinic keratosis on the head: actinic keratosis area and severity index
Actinic keratosis (AK) severity is currently evaluated by subjective assessment of patients.
To develop and perform an initial pilot validation of a new easy-to-use quantitative tool for assessing AK severity on the head.
The actinic keratosis area and severity index (AKASI) for the head was developed based on a review of other severity scoring systems in dermatology, in particular the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Initial validation was performed by 13 physicians assessing AK severity in 18 AK patients and two controls using a physician global assessment (PGA) and AKASI. To determine an AKASI score, the head was divided into four regions (scalp, forehead, left/right cheek ear, chin and nose). In each region, the percentage of the area affected by AKs was estimated, and the severities of three clinical signs of AK were assessed: distribution, erythema and thickness.
There was a strong correlation between AKASI and PGA scores (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.86). AKASI was able to discriminate between different PGA categories: mean (SD) AKASI increased from 2.88 (1.18) for 'light' to 5.33 (1.48) for 'moderate', 8.28 (1.89) for 'severe', and 8.73 (3.03) for 'very severe' PGA classification. The coefficient of variation for AKASI scores was low and relatively constant across all PGA categories.
Actinic keratosis area and severity index is proposed as a new quantitative tool for assessing AK severity on the head. It may be useful in the future evaluation of new AK treatments in clinical studies and the management of AK in daily practice.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401585
A proposed scoring system for assessing the severity of actinic keratosis on the head: actinic keratosis area and severity index
BACKGROUND:
OBJECTIVES:
METHODS:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSIONS:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401585
#josepmalvehy #erythema #psoriasis #dermatoscopy #dermatology #dermatologiabarcelona #dermatologobarcelona #doctormalvehy #cedilp
jueves, 8 de febrero de 2018
Dermoscopic Clues for Diagnosing Melanomas That Resemble Seborrheic Keratosis.
PubMed
Abstract
Importance:
Objective:
Design, Setting, and Participants:
Main Outcomes and Measures:
Results:
Conclusions and Relevance:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355453
martes, 6 de febrero de 2018
Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era: Metadata and Standards.
Abstract
Etiquetas:
dermatologic,
dermoscopic,
diagnosisdermatologica,
dicom,
josepmalvehy,
skinimaging,
teledermatology
jueves, 1 de febrero de 2018
Dermoscopy versus reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna
PubMed
Dermoscopy versus reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna
BACKGROUND:
Several dermoscopic and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) diagnostic criteria of lentigo maligna (LM)/lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) have been identified. However, no study compared the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques.
We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for LM/LMM using a holistic assessment of the images.
223 facial lesions were evaluated by 21 experts. Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical, dermoscopic and RCM examination were compared. Inter-investigator variability and confidence level in the diagnosis were also evaluated.
Overall diagnostic accuracy of the two imaging techniques was good (area under the curve of the sROC function: 0.89). RCM was more sensitive (80%, versus 61%) and less specific (81% versus 92%) than dermoscopy for LM/LMM. In particular RCM showed a higher sensitivity for hypomelanotic and recurrent LM/LMM. RCM had a higher inter-investigator agreement and a higher confidence level in the diagnosis than dermoscopy.
RCM and dermoscopy are both useful techniques for the diagnosis of facial lesions and in particular LM/LMM. RCM is particularly suitable for the identification of hypomelanotic and recurrent LM/LMM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341263
Dermoscopy versus reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna
BACKGROUND:
OBJECTIVE:
METHODS:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSION:
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
lunes, 29 de enero de 2018
Response to "Phase IV head-to-head randomised controlled trial comparing ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel with diclofenac sodium 3% gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis on the face or scalp".
PubMed
Abstract
We read with attention the recent paper by Stockfleth et al1 on the efficacy and safety of Ingenol Mebutate 0.015% gel (IngMb) vs. diclofenac sodium 3% gel (DS) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Regarding this interesting study, we would like to address some comments to the authors.In this study, the primary endpoint was complete clearance of AKs (AKCLEAR100) at end of first treatment course (Week8, IngMeb; Week17, DS).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29205276
#susanapuig #josepmalvehy #queratosis #akclear100 #treatmentactinickeratosis #actinickeratosis #keratosis #queratosis #tratamientoqueratosisactinica
Abstract
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29205276
#susanapuig #josepmalvehy #queratosis #akclear100 #treatmentactinickeratosis #actinickeratosis #keratosis #queratosis #tratamientoqueratosisactinica
Etiquetas:
actinickeratosis,
akclear100,
josepmalvehy,
queratosis,
queratosisactinica,
susanapuig
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)